I’m very much against effectively telling herms, male-herms, dickgirls, cuntboys and shemales that they’re not supported/acknowledged by Wolfery if we were to take actions which remove/replace/exclude any tags they prefer to self identify as. I feel even more strongly about this since we have a number of characters already present on the site who identify as either these gender terms. Those users have used these terms intentionally instead of any other terms deemed more socially acceptable when identifying their characters (often characters which are persona rather than simply characters). I think that needs acknowledged when thinking about making changes to those gender tags since the replacements may not be sufficiently accurate as to the nature of the character aspects being sought with these tags.
If we wish to include additional (more socially acceptable) tags for people to choose to use on their own (without excluding people’s term of choice), then that’s a great solution. Inclusion without exclusion.
We should provide people with more options rather than a lack of options so they can find whatever it is they’re interested in for or want to be identified as.
In general, if a fairly known or searchable label theme/kink/gender/roleplay tag is missing and somebody makes a forum post in good faith asking for it, we should look to help with that, even if that tag isn’t everyone’s cup of tea.